
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
Venture Capital
Venture capital invested as a percentage of Gross State Product.
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? In relative terms, venture capital (funds
invested in new and unproven businesses) amounts to a small share of the
overall capital markets, but its value goes beyond a simple dollar figure.
Venture capital spurs growth at the critical early stages of growing companies
development. Moreover, venture capitalists dont just throw their
money at startup companies hoping to get lucky and pick a winner. They
become involved as board members and management advisors, suggesting strategic
partnerships, and helping to refine business plans. And venture-based
companies are a key source of job growthemployment in venture-backed
companies increased 34 percent annually between 1991 and 1995, while employment
in Fortune 500 companies declined 3.6 percent. In the nation as a whole,
venture capital investments have increased from an average of $6 billion
in the early 1980s to $12 billion in 1997 (in constant 1992 dollars),
and from 0.10 percent to 0.16 percent of GDP. In 1997, it was disbursed
to some 2,485 companies, five times more than in 1980.27
THE
RANKINGS: Venture capital investments are highly concentrated in a few states,
particularly states with strong university engineering and science programs and an
existing base of high-tech companies, both of which can be the source of many
entrepreneurial start-ups or spinoffs. But as venture capital investments have increased,
even middle-ranking states obtain significant amounts of venture capital.

| STATES BY
RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Massachusetts |
0.62% |
| 2 |
California |
0.50% |
| 3 |
Colorado |
0.34% |
| 4 |
New Hampshire |
0.29% |
| 5 |
Washington |
0.24% |
| 6 |
Tennessee |
0.18% |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
0.17% |
| 8 |
Georgia |
0.16% |
| 9 |
Texas |
0.16% |
| 10 |
North Carolina |
0.15% |
| 11 |
New Jersey |
0.14% |
| 12 |
Florida |
0.13% |
| 13 |
Arizona |
0.12% |
| 14 |
Connecticut |
0.11% |
| 15 |
Illinois |
0.11% |
| 16 |
Missouri |
0.11% |
| 17 |
Pennsylvania |
0.11% |
| 18 |
Oregon |
0.11% |
| 19 |
Maryland |
0.10% |
| 20 |
South Carolina |
0.10% |
| 21 |
Virginia |
0.10% |
| 22 |
Utah |
0.09% |
| 23 |
Kentucky |
0.08% |
| 24 |
New York |
0.07% |
| 25 |
Montana |
0.07% |
| 26 |
Kansas |
0.07% |
| 27 |
Wisconsin |
0.07% |
| 28 |
Nevada |
0.07% |
| 29 |
Ohio |
0.06% |
| 30 |
Hawaii |
0.04% |
| 31 |
Michigan |
0.04% |
| 32 |
Maine |
0.03% |
| 33 |
Indiana |
0.03% |
| 34 |
Alabama |
0.03% |
| 35 |
Iowa |
0.02% |
| 36 |
Louisiana |
0.01% |
| 37 |
Idaho |
0.01% |
| 38 |
Oklahoma |
0.01% |
| 39 |
Vermont |
0.01% |
| 40 |
Delaware |
0.00% |
| 41 |
Mississippi |
0.00% |
| 42 |
Nebraska |
0.00% |
| 43 |
Rhode Island |
0.00% |
| 44 |
North Dakota |
0.00% |
| 45 |
Alaska |
0.00% |
| 46 |
New Mexico |
0.00% |
| 47 |
Arkansas |
0.00% |
| 48 |
West Virginia |
0.00% |
| 49 |
South Dakota |
0.00% |
| 50 |
Wyoming |
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
U.S. average |
0.17% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| State |
Rank |
Score |
| Alabama |
34 |
0.03% |
| Alaska |
45 |
0.00% |
| Arizona |
13 |
0.12% |
| Arkansas |
47 |
0.00% |
| California |
2 |
0.50% |
| Colorado |
3 |
0.34% |
| Connecticut |
14 |
0.11% |
| Delaware |
40 |
0.00% |
| Florida |
12 |
0.13% |
| Georgia |
8 |
0.16% |
| Hawaii |
30 |
0.04% |
| Idaho |
37 |
0.01% |
| Illinois |
15 |
0.11% |
| Indiana |
33 |
0.03% |
| Iowa |
35 |
0.02% |
| Kansas |
26 |
0.07% |
| Kentucky |
23 |
0.08% |
| Louisiana |
36 |
0.01% |
| Maine |
32 |
0.03% |
| Maryland |
19 |
0.10% |
| Massachusetts |
1 |
0.62% |
| Michigan |
31 |
0.04% |
| Minnesota |
7 |
0.17% |
| Mississippi |
41 |
0.00% |
| Missouri |
16 |
0.11% |
| Montana |
25 |
0.07% |
| Nebraska |
42 |
0.00% |
| Nevada |
28 |
0.07% |
| New Hampshire |
4 |
0.29% |
| New Jersey |
11 |
0.14% |
| New Mexico |
46 |
0.00% |
| New York |
24 |
0.07% |
| North Carolina |
10 |
0.15% |
| North Dakota |
44 |
0.00% |
| Ohio |
29 |
0.06% |
| Oklahoma |
38 |
0.01% |
| Oregon |
18 |
0.11% |
| Pennsylvania |
17 |
0.11% |
| Rhode Island |
43 |
0.00% |
| South Carolina |
20 |
0.10% |
| South Dakota |
49 |
0.00% |
| Tennessee |
6 |
0.18% |
| Texas |
9 |
0.16% |
| Utah |
22 |
0.09% |
| Vermont |
39 |
0.01% |
| Virginia |
21 |
0.10% |
| Washington |
5 |
0.24% |
| West Virginia |
48 |
0.00% |
| Wisconsin |
27 |
0.07% |
| Wyoming |
50 |
0.00% |
|
Source: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, 1997 data.
Go
to Economic Development Strategies page >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|