|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
Venture Capital
Venture capital invested as a share of gross metropolitan product.
Why Is
This Important?
In relative terms, venture capital (funds invested in new and unproven
businesses) amounts to a small share of the overall capital markets, but
its value goes beyond a simple dollar figure. Venture capital spurs growth
at the critical early stages of growing companies' development. Moreover,
venture capitalists don't just throw their money at start-up companies
hoping to get lucky and pick a winner. They become involved as board members
and management advisers, suggesting strategic partnerships and helping
to refine business plans. And venture-based companies are a key source
of job growth - employment in venture-backed companies increased 34 percent
annually between 1991 and 1995, while employment in Fortune 500 companies
declined 3.6 percent. In the nation as a whole, venture capital has increased
from an average of $6 billion in the early 1980s to $30 billion in 1999
(in constant 1992 dollars), and from 0.10 percent of GDP to 0.37 percent.
In 1999, it was disbursed to some 4,000 companies, eight times as many
as in 1980.
The Rankings:
Venture capital is a story of Silicon Valley and everyone else. The San
Francisco metro area receives over twice as much venture capital as a
share of its economy as does Seattle, the next-highest metro. This is
clearly because the area remains the technological innovation capital
of the globe, with a strong presence in a host of high-tech sectors, including
biotech, Internet, telecom, computers, and devices. In contrast, other
top-ranking metros, including Seattle, Austin, Raleigh-Durham, San Diego,
and Washington, D.C., are much more specialized on one or two high-tech
industries.28 The
presence of strong university engineering and science programs, in places
like Silicon Valley, Austin, and Raleigh, is also associated with venture
capital investments.

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
San Francisco |
5.50% |
| 2 |
Seattle |
2.71% |
| 3 |
Austin |
1.83% |
| 4 |
Boston |
1.53% |
| 5 |
Raleigh-Durham |
1.35% |
| 6 |
Denver |
1.20% |
| 7 |
San Diego |
1.01% |
| 8 |
Grand Rapids |
0.49% |
| 9 |
Washington |
0.44% |
| 10 |
Portland |
0.43% |
| 11 |
Atlanta |
0.42% |
| 12 |
Minneapolis |
0.42% |
| 13 |
Los Angeles |
0.36% |
| 14 |
Orlando |
0.34% |
| 15 |
St. Louis |
0.34% |
| 16 |
New York |
0.33% |
| 17 |
Las Vegas |
0.30% |
| 18 |
Miami |
0.29% |
| 19 |
Rochester |
0.29% |
| 20 |
Nashville |
0.24% |
| 21 |
Chicago |
0.23% |
| 22 |
Philadelphia |
0.23% |
| 23 |
Phoenix |
0.22% |
| 24 |
Dallas |
0.20% |
| 25 |
Sacramento |
0.18% |
| 26 |
Pittsburgh |
0.17% |
| 27 |
Louisville |
0.16% |
| 28 |
Hartford |
0.16% |
| 29 |
Salt Lake City |
0.14% |
| 30 |
West Palm Beach |
0.14% |
| 31 |
Houston |
0.13% |
| 32 |
San Antonio |
0.10% |
| 33 |
Charlotte |
0.10% |
| 34 |
Tampa |
0.09% |
| 35 |
Oklahoma City |
0.09% |
| 36 |
Cincinnati |
0.09% |
| 37 |
Buffalo |
0.08% |
| 38 |
Milwaukee |
0.08% |
| 39 |
New Orleans |
0.07% |
| 40 |
Detroit |
0.04% |
| 41 |
Jacksonville |
0.04% |
| 42 |
Cleveland |
0.04% |
| 43 |
Kansas City |
0.04% |
| 44 |
Columbus |
0.04% |
| 45 |
Dayton |
0.04% |
| 46 |
Norfolk |
0.02% |
| 47 |
Richmond |
0.02% |
| 48 |
Indianapolis |
0.01% |
| 49 |
Memphis |
0.00% |
| 50 |
Greensboro |
0.00% |
|
U.S. Average |
0.38% |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
0.59% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
11 |
0.42% |
| Austin |
3 |
1.83% |
| Boston |
4 |
1.53% |
| Buffalo |
37 |
0.08% |
| Charlotte |
33 |
0.10% |
| Chicago |
21 |
0.23% |
| Cincinnati |
36 |
0.09% |
| Cleveland |
42 |
0.04% |
| Columbus |
44 |
0.04% |
| Dallas |
24 |
0.20% |
| Dayton |
45 |
0.04% |
| Denver |
6 |
1.20% |
| Detroit |
40 |
0.04% |
| Grand Rapids |
8 |
0.49% |
| Greensboro |
50 |
0.00% |
| Hartford |
28 |
0.16% |
| Houston |
31 |
0.13% |
| Indianapolis |
48 |
0.01% |
| Jacksonville |
41 |
0.04% |
| Kansas City |
43 |
0.04% |
| Las Vegas |
17 |
0.30% |
| Los Angeles |
13 |
0.36% |
| Louisville |
27 |
0.16% |
| Memphis |
49 |
0.00% |
| Miami |
18 |
0.29% |
| Milwaukee |
38 |
0.08% |
| Minneapolis |
12 |
0.42% |
| Nashville |
20 |
0.24% |
| New Orleans |
39 |
0.07% |
| New York |
16 |
0.33% |
| Norfolk |
46 |
0.02% |
| Oklahoma City |
35 |
0.09% |
| Orlando |
14 |
0.34% |
| Philadelphia |
22 |
0.23% |
| Phoenix |
23 |
0.22% |
| Pittsburgh |
26 |
0.17% |
| Portland |
10 |
0.43% |
| Raleigh-Durham |
5 |
1.35% |
| Richmond |
47 |
0.02% |
| Rochester |
19 |
0.29% |
| Sacramento |
25 |
0.18% |
| Salt Lake City |
29 |
0.14% |
| San Antonio |
32 |
0.10% |
| San Diego |
7 |
1.01% |
| San Francisco |
1 |
5.50% |
| Seattle |
2 |
2.71% |
| St. Louis |
15 |
0.34% |
| Tampa |
34 |
0.09% |
| Washington |
9 |
0.44% |
| West Palm Beach |
30 |
0.14% |
|
Economic
Development Strategies >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|